George A. Davis stories are quick reads, and some stories are more captivating than others. The stories stand on their own as portraits of people and places that contemporary society deems underground and criminal. - Kevin Smith (from JimSam Publishing).
A few of my stories available to read free at:
http://www.readwave.com/writergeorge
http://www.writing.com/authors/davisga
Short Story Collections available at Amazon.com, Kindle or BarnesandNoble.com
TALES FROM A THORNBUSH 5 star review (2007) ebook or paperback
STREET LIFE: adventure in the asphalt cement jungle 4.5 star review (2008) paperback
IN THE ROUGH (2008) paperback
HE'S NOT A DOG AND OTHER STORIES (2009) paperback
WYLIE (a female bodyguard) AND OTHER STORIES (2011) ebook
MEN ARE SOMETIMES LIKE CATS (2013) paperback
STREETLIGHT (manuscript)
Reviews
Judith Stark Creative Writing Award for Script work Community College of Philadelphia
Third Place in Scripts Tampa Writers Alliance 23rd Annual Writing Contest
Black Short Stories Editor's Picks; Author of the Month
Writers Platform Editor's Choice Award and Number One Most Read Story
A few of my stories available to read free at:
http://www.readwave.com/writergeorge
http://www.writing.com/authors/davisga
Short Story Collections available at Amazon.com, Kindle or BarnesandNoble.com
TALES FROM A THORNBUSH 5 star review (2007) ebook or paperback
STREET LIFE: adventure in the asphalt cement jungle 4.5 star review (2008) paperback
IN THE ROUGH (2008) paperback
HE'S NOT A DOG AND OTHER STORIES (2009) paperback
WYLIE (a female bodyguard) AND OTHER STORIES (2011) ebook
MEN ARE SOMETIMES LIKE CATS (2013) paperback
STREETLIGHT (manuscript)
George A. Davis dialogue is Hemingwayesque, though his characters are poignant like Lorrie Mooresque. - Gotham's Writer's Workshop Instructor Michael Lukas.
Shades of O. Henry, Your writing has a melodic tempo, excellent, I wouldn't touch a word of it - from a reader of my story Old Timer.
His characters are race neutral; it's up to the reader.
Writing Awards:His characters are race neutral; it's up to the reader.
Judith Stark Creative Writing Award for Script work Community College of Philadelphia
Third Place in Scripts Tampa Writers Alliance 23rd Annual Writing Contest
Black Short Stories Editor's Picks; Author of the Month
Writers Platform Editor's Choice Award and Number One Most Read Story
Facebook Page
https://www.facebook.com/pages/George-A-Davis/107327886035282
More Reviews
https://www.facebook.com/pages/George-A-Davis/107327886035282
More Reviews
“In the
Rough” and “Street Life” by George Arthur Davis
Portraits of
the Urban underground of early 1970’s Philadelphia figure prominently in the
short stories contained in the books “In the Rough” and “Street Life” by George
Arthur Davis.
According to
the bio information, Davis was born in Philadelphia in 1947. While the reader can infer that Davis
is fond of his hometown, it is difficult to determine if he’s writing from
experience or simply using the city as a backdrop for a world full of drug
dealers, lesbian loan sharks and two-bit hoodlums. The stories are gritty and brief, and fall between the lines
of crime stories and tales of the seamier side of humanity. Davis does not indulge in sympathetic
views of the characters; most of the stories offer a blunt narrative that has
the feel of someone merely relating events that occurred.
In “Street
Life”, there are a number of characters that appear in several stories,
creating more of a centralized thread than in “In the Rough”. One of the stories appears in both
books, although under different titles, and Davis does include stories that
take place in Florida and New York in addition to the Philly tales.
Both books
are quick reads, and some stories are more captivating than others. A couple of stories leave the reader
wanting a bit more to bring the situation to a satisfactory conclusion, but the
stories stand on their own as portraits of people and places that contemporary
society deems underground and criminal.
- Kevin Smith
from JimSam Publishing
Greetings George:
Thanks for sending on
the review--and congratulations for your work. Overall, I agree with
the reviewer's comments. He should have mentioned also how interesting the
characters and situations are--brief glimpses of life, tightly written.
Keep up the good work.
Best, Rufus Caleb
In
the Rough
George
Arthur Davis
The
Peppertree Press (2008)
ISBN 9780982047941
Reviewed
by William Phenn
for Reader Views (8/09)
Not your typical daily fare, but the unadulterated
stories of ‘the hood,’ gangs, crime and much more. Mr. Davis can do little
to change things in the city but he brings it out in his stories. He writes
about it and makes the world aware that it’s there and will continue to thrive
unless things change.
This is the setting for the stories that George
Davis presents. They are a cross section of his life, stories that he is
relating to us about what he has seen and heard. He relates his experiences of
life as he moved on in time. Some stories are funny, some tragic, but all will
keep you reading till the end.
George tells stories of rivalry between the
underworld thugs and their seedy bedfellows (“A Phalanx of Tough Guys”), Bull
Dykes (“Mickie the Dyke”), hookers with golden hearts (“Yancey’s Holiday
Weekend”) and innocent wives that get caught up in this tangled web because of
their husbands (“Jay Wall’s Wife Looks For the Truth”); they are all here.
Some of the very short stories of this short-story
collection left a little to be desired. I don’t know if I expected a different
ending or just something a bit more than what was there, in any case; the few
questionable ones were very brief and with an unusual ending. In my
opinion, the only deterring factor in the whole book.
With its raw language and some of the descriptive
verbiage, this book would not be one for young adults or teens. It is a graphic
depiction of real life and as such, there are parts of it that are not suited
for the general audience.
With a
hard-hitting series of tales and a fast-moving write, I gave “In the Rough” by
George Arthur Davis a C+ because of some poor editing (which is not the fault
of the author but instead of the publisher). The stories were interesting, the
writing was captivating, but the proofreading and editing left me skeptical.